Liam Draxl vs Tommaso Carnevale-Miino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Draxl vs T. Carnevale-Miino

Liam Draxl
CAN
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
23
Age
25
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
6'5" (196 cm)
119
C. Rank
0
113
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$31.2K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Tommaso Carnevale-Miino
ITA
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
23
Age
25
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
6'5" (196 cm)
119
C. Rank
0
113
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$31.2K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Draxl 0 - 0 Carnevale-Miino
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Draxl | 0 |
Carnevale-Miino | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
L. Draxl vs T. Carnevale-Miino H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$31,240 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
64.92% (211-114) | Career Total W/L | 48.07% (87-94) |
9 | Titles | 0 |
50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Draxl vs T. Carnevale-Miino Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Liam Draxl has won 44.36% of points on their second serve, while Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Liam Draxl, in recent form, has won 48.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.26% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Liam Draxl has saved 50.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Liam Draxl has won 70.41% of matches played (W/L 69/29), with Tommaso Carnevale-Miino winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Liam Draxl has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 51/22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 2/2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 28/35).
- Player level: In the last year, Liam Draxl has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.24% of matches (W/L 52/19), where as Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Liam Draxl has played against opponents with an average rank of 323.62 while Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Liam Draxl has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Liam Draxl has converted 31.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tommaso Carnevale-Miino has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Liam Draxl vs Tommaso Carnevale-Miino Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Draxl 47%, Carnevale-Miino 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Draxl 53%, Carnevale-Miino 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Draxl 62%, Carnevale-Miino 0%.
L. Draxl Recent Matches Played
T. Carnevale-Miino Recent Matches Played

L. Draxl vs T. Carnevale-Miino Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64.92% (211/114) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.07% (87/94) |
62.74% (458/272) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.62% (198/201) |
55.25% (3769/3053) | Games Win/Loss | 50.30% (1837/1815) |
65.06% (108/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.44% (28/35) |
61.18% (52/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (57/57) |
69.86% (51/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
1092 | Aces Total | 82 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
927 | Total Double Faults | 204 |
1:41:4 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
413.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 215.2 |
65% (13288/20330) | 1st Serve % | 66% (2448/3691) |
70% (9247/13288) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1473/2448) |
50% (3513/7042) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (557/1243) |
47% (1041/2216) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (149/333) |
42% (8636/20472) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1343/3400) |
0.00% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
20.00% (2/8) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
61.70% (87/54) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
72.73% (120/45) | Futures W/L | 48.07% (87/94) |
65% (205/313) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (85/174) |
100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
58% (49/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (13/25) |
56% (49/87) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (18/44) |
90% (212/190) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (91/80) |
9% (212/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (91/10) |
19% (112/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (90/7) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:05 PM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
1.727
W2
1.99
08:15 PM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
1.12
W2
5.3
10:00 AM 10/10/25
PredictionW1
2.3
W2
1.57
10:00 AM 10/10/25
PredictionW1
2.22
W2
1.61
08:30 PM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
2.68
W2
1.43
09:00 AM 11/10/25
PredictionW1
1.06
W2
9
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
08:00
H2H 7-5
13:30
H2H 7-4
06:00
H2H 1-4
14:00
H2H 0-5
10:00
H2H 0-2